Hi! Please don't forget to label your posts with the date the reading is due and your name and last name. So, for example, for the first blog post I would label my post with these two tags "09/11/2014" and "Ali Bolcakan" [without the quotes of course].

10/20/2014

The Tower


I was surprised to read these versions of the story of Babel and the tower because it was such a different story than the one I had always referenced from prior knowledge. Before reading these text selections, the only story that I knew about a tower and the intention to somehow confront God by building a tower to reach the heavens was from the Quran. The Quran references this story in a very different light than what was said in the Hebrew Bible selections. It was very interesting to see those stark contrasts and still see some similar attributes. In the Quran, the tower is referenced when the Pharaoh laughs at Moses’ statement of belief in one God and says that he doesn’t know of any God but himself, so he orders a guy named Haman to “bake bricks out of clay and set up for [him] a lofty tower in order that [he] may look at the God of Moses.” The similarities lie with the idea of “baking bricks” and making a tower to be at the same level of God, but this story never included the mention of “one language.” Also, the punishment in the Quran was that they (the disbelievers and Pharaoh) were drowned because of this action and others, but it had nothing to say about the dispersing of people as a punishment. I just thought it was so interesting that the Bible told a story of how language began and spread throughout the world and how the Quran didn’t have that story.

3 comments:

  1. I think that's the most interesting aspects of religion; that all these religions can be so different and yet still share some things. It's also interesting to see how each religion has developed the story. You mention that the Quran omitted the part about language, and yet they mirror other parts of the story; it makes you wonder why that part was important to their interpretation of Babel.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It was very interesting to read different translations of this story. Though they are very similar in wording, the meaning can be entirely different (as you noted when comparing these translations to the story in the quran).

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with both of you and thought your perspectives were very interesting. The meanings in which they are used can help the reader understand what needs emphasis. If the Quran mentioned how having a unifying language would go against God, then it would contradict other statements in the Quran where it encourages people "to know one another." The unity of language is promoted because God in this light would want people to understand the different languages and people, as opposed to the text selections as being looked down upon by God.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.