Hi! Please don't forget to label your posts with the date the reading is due and your name and last name. So, for example, for the first blog post I would label my post with these two tags "09/11/2014" and "Ali Bolcakan" [without the quotes of course].

10/08/2014

Reaction to "Religulous"

While watching, "Religulous," I realized that I much prefer intellectual explanations as to why humans should give up religion. Although I am an atheist who always enjoys watching religious people be explicitly questioned about the things they believe, I feel more comfortable watching an overzealous religious person be questioned by a scientist than I do a comedian. I feel this way because somehow religion has become a taboo conversation topic in recent years, as if people are afraid of offending someone else's faith. Maybe this is because of the recent examples we have seen around the world where religion is taken so seriously that people are killed for making fun of it. I believe we are at a point in time where we need to talk about religion and find out what it is that people truly believe: if people do not verbalize their beliefs and are never questioned about them, how can they ever be made aware that they believe something crazy? Without this discourse, people can continue to have irrational beliefs that they will act upon because they "believe" so strongly in them. I believe scientists should take on the role of educators when it comes to religion, because a majority of people know so little about science that they are willing to accept any religion that comforts them. This suspension of disbelief allows for people to believe things that make very little logical sense. Bill Maher does a great job of making a mockery of religion, but that only makes religious people defensive about their own faith, as a natural reaction to being made fun of. I think science is the only way to truly convince people that the workings of the universe are far too extraordinary for someone, or something, to create.

4 comments:

  1. You definitely offer a viewpoint that I hadn't considered when writing my blog post, and I definitely agree. When someone's religion is mocked they immediately get defensive and will do whatever they can to defend their beliefs. If they are educated about science, however, there stands a chance that their minds might be changed

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with a lot of what you said, however I don't think it's fair to call Bill Maher solely a comedian. He is a brilliant satirist, TV host, author, scholar, etc. While the scientist may offer more hard evidence, it is not easy to doubt Bill Maher's credibility. He uses unbelievable wit and satire to expose flaws in religion and that's what makes this such an effective documentary.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you on the fact that having debates about religion can help people better understand what they themselves believe in, but I do not agree with Bill Maher's methods. I honestly would rather watch debate between two people that are well researched in religion and science have a debate because picking out people with radical views and making a fool out of them isn't an intellectual debate and reasonably won't accomplish much.
    I disagree with the other things you said because I'm not an atheist, but I mean that's kind of a given.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with Julia. There's still hope for humanity. Religion and science do not have to be at opposite ends of each other. They can be intertwined and help bring a better discussion to the world. While Bill Maher quoted many verses in the Quran to show Islam negatively, one verse that he should have mentioned was how "those who truly fear God among his servants are the ones who have knowledge". We can't blindly follow religion even in Islam, people should research and learn the religion for themselves. If we can increase how we intellectually approach ideas, then religion shouldn't sound "crazy" or "irrational" to you at all.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.